LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 天前I don't understand physics so this is credible to mepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down16
arrow-up1302arrow-down1imageI don't understand physics so this is credible to mepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 天前message-square18fedilink
minus-squareKaryoplasma@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·2 天前What I think is funny is that if you assumed E=mc^2 for all particles, then that would mean that red light is lighter than blue light.
minus-squareLvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·2 天前This, too: if E = hc/λ and E = mc², then we can combine both as hc/λ = mc². Rearranging this shit you get m = h/λc. Since h/c = 2.2*10⁻⁴²kg*m, you’d get: Photon colour wavelength (in nm) “Weight” (in 10⁻³⁶kg = 10⁻³qg) red 650 3.4 yellow 600 3.7 green 550 4.0 blue 450 4.9 …BLOODY ULTRAVIOLET IS MAKING ME FAT!
What I think is funny is that if you assumed E=mc^2 for all particles, then that would mean that red light is lighter than blue light.
This, too: if E = hc/λ and E = mc², then we can combine both as hc/λ = mc². Rearranging this shit you get m = h/λc. Since h/c = 2.2*10⁻⁴²kg*m, you’d get:
…BLOODY ULTRAVIOLET IS MAKING ME FAT!