• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is one of the things that pisses me off about the Star Trek “fans” who point to the Replicator tech (which wasn’t introduced until the Next Generation series) as the reason humanity was able to end scarcity. No, it absolutely was not what ended scarcity in the Star Trek universe. What ended scarcity was the absolute end of capitalism. We have now and have had for over a century, the capability to end world hunger and provide housing for every man woman and child on the planet. We don’t do it because it would remove the overinflated value of those things as well as the obscene wealth of the rich.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Capitalism requires scarcity as its engine.
      When scarcity is threatened, it is called the capitalist dirty word “commodity”.
      It means there is no more profit in that.

    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Even if that wasn’t true, do you know how much energy it takes to turn energy into mass (unless I don’t understand the tech and it works like a 3D printer or something). If a society has this much (free or at least affordable) energy, even without a replicator there is so much abundance.