fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 天前Resourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square229fedilinkarrow-up1862arrow-down146
arrow-up1816arrow-down1imageResourcesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 天前message-square229fedilink
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down7·3 天前But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·3 天前numbers must go up
minus-squarerainwall@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·3 天前Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·3 天前Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
numbers must go up
Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.