Last week, we warned of a coming anti-democratic backslide. Now, we see it happening.
Under the new law, the prosecutor general, a notoriously non-independent figure, will now oversee anti-corruption investigations — in a complete overturn of the system that was set up to be independent from other law enforcement bodies.
In reality, it means that Zelensky’s office will be able to stop investigations with a phone call.
It also closely follows an escalated prosecution of Ukraine’s best-known anti-corruption activist, an outspoken critic of Zelensky.
This is an editorial though, it has nothing to do with their journalists.
Editorial by The Kyiv Independent. That is their jounalists.
So, unnamed journalists, or perhaps the owner, or…? No leader is perfect, but wartime and holding your own against Putin is no easy feat. You could do 1000x worse than him and now you’re nitpicking during war time? I guess I’m jealous that you feel like you can when our trainwreck is still building concentration camps to enrich his buddies.
The last few lines are getting closer,
The independent is journalist owned, afaik.
This is wikipedia, so it’s probably a little biased. Biased in what way is something I don’t know enough to say. This does tell us something though, they want to hold everyone’s feet to the fire. I understand why journalists want to do this is normal times, but when there is a war going on, you need people to be behind you. Also, most people are ignorant and need to be spoon fed, especially during war time. They have other shit on their mind and they need a hero in their lives.
The Kyiv Independent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kyiv_Independent
Edit: I’m going to add this, they are owned by journalists and a media company apparently
On the whole Wikipedia is biased toward capitalism & Western imperialism/neocolonialism.
The Grayzone, 2020: Meet Wikipedia’s Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundation’s regime-change operative CEO
Katherine Maher has since left her Wikimedia CEO position for the NPR CEO position. She’s also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Atlantic Council, and the US State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board, among other Atlantacist organizations. She used to work for the World Bank.
Nah, I meant the editors can be biased occasionally. Articles can be edited like a see saw from biased to unbiased to biased the other way, etc.
The Ukrainian revolution had from the very start an anti corruption message. Politicians have both taken advantage and undermined it. This week is not unexpected. Zelenskyy backtracking today is not unexpected. Him using smoke and mirrors, in his new idea, to avoid undermining political allies will not be unexpected next month.
It is utterly predictable that this newspaper will issue similar editorial later.
One day there will be not so much corruption in the life blood of Ukrainian politics. But not soon. Maybe in a generation?
yeah I sorta wish the news communities did not allow editorials. I mean im pretty sure they would not allow people to just post about their opinion of some news.
I don’t mind editorials with a name or names behind them because you then look them up and see what kind of intentions they have. This is no bueno.
meh. I feel an editorial is like our comments on a news article. I sorta wish we could seperate news items and editorials.
I can see that, but I disagree. If Bernie Sanders wrote an editorial about cleaning up politics, I would want to read that. I probably wouldn’t want to read about /u/ilovetits’s take on it.
Separating news and editorial would not stop that though. You would just read it in an editorial community rather than a news one.