• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The tex there has the Greek letter chi instead of Latin x at the end and is supposed to be reminiscent of a Greek root from which we derived the word technique: techne or τέχνη. The tex there is just pronounced tech usually. The original intention I believe was for it to sound like the ch in loch or bach but that sound isn’t seen in modern English(generally even in the examples I gave). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiceless_uvular_fricative

    For all the star Trek nerds: that’s close to what the Klingon word gagh ends with. Gagh has a voiced uvular fricative, so just do the same without voice and just air and you’ll get chi.

    • matiamas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not to be too pedantic, the modern Greek chi is a voiceless velar fricative (or in some cases a voiceless palatal fricative) rather than uvular. The velar location is the same place English pronounces the letter k, uvular is a bit further back, more like the French r. It’s a little confusing because the IPA uses the chi symbol for the voiceless uvular fricative even though Greek doesn’t pronounce it that way. In Klingon, the voiceless velar fricative is written as H (I believe gh is a voiced velar fricative rather than uvular as well). I think the uvular consonants are q and Q. Apologies if my pedantry was unwelcome

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Uvular fricative somehow reminds me of friction of the vulva.
      They’re nor related, are they?