I personally believe there is no way for them to succeed. If they were acting in good faith the actual incease in the number of intelligent people, who would recognize cruelty when they see it, would tear it down. If they acted in bad faith, which they most definitely would, they would fill the world with these idiots.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Intelligent people don’t always come to the same conclusions.

    If the entire society has been based on eugenics from the beginning, that IS their moral compass. Much like how most of us hold Democracy with such high regard. Our last election now has me wondering if letting 100 million ignorant people choose a rapist felon for our leader is actually the BEST way, but giving every person a voice and a vote is our political morality.

    I suspect a eugenics based society would recognize the “inconveniences” that some people face, but their idea of “greater good for society” will outweigh a lot of that.

    Definitely not supporting the idea of eugenics, but I do think that people who were raised on it, would see it in a more positive light than we do now.

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Youre not supporting the idea of eugenics because you know it to be lunacy. If they were acting in good faith, the more intelligent society would recognize the lunacy as well. If not they would remain dumb.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Science is consistent. If mankind started over from scratch, they would eventually come to the same scientific conclusions as us.

        Society and morality is VERY abstract and every society has their own unique spin on it. We have no idea what societal structures would exist after a hypothetical human reset.

        Democracy revolves around “every body has value”, and in that light, elimination of “inferior” people is horrific.

        But eugenics is more of a “sacrifice some for the greater good” kind of belief, and they would believe that their actions are morally superior to the “selfishness of having unauthorized offspring”.

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Societies have 100% operated under other moral structures. Under the moral operative that human life is inherently valuable our society has progressed further then any other recorded civilization.