• null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    I feel obligated to provide some context here.

    Australia certainly is, like most countries, “deeply racist” but exactly what that means and how we compare to other countries is contentious.

    Calling immigration detention facilities “concentration camps” is disingenuous and has connotations that dont apply. At last count in 2021 there were 107 residents, all of whom could leave at any time, and were provided multiple resettlement options outside of Australia.

    There are criticisms to be made but they are not “concentration camps”.

    The fauna thing is an obvious myth that doesn’t withstand a moments critical though. There’s a more comprehensive rebuttal here:

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-20/fact-check-flora-and-fauna-1967-referendum/9550650

    Australia does have deeply embedded tensions around race. They’re not easily solvable problems. Are more salient example might be the recent rejection of the voice referendum, but that would take more than a few moments to read and understand.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Calling immigration detention facilities “concentration camps” is disingenuous

      Someone hasn’t heard of Nauru and the Pacific Solution…

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The sentence you quoted links the Wikipedia article about the pacific solution, and the paragraph explains why calling them concentration camps is disingenuous. Well done.