If any of you lovely shitposters have the same for instagram and tik tok my homies in discord¹ will be very pleased
¹ Yes I try to bring them into Matrix or Lemmy but it is not that easy
If any of you lovely shitposters have the same for instagram and tik tok my homies in discord¹ will be very pleased
¹ Yes I try to bring them into Matrix or Lemmy but it is not that easy
Now let’s create drama
Let’s do the same for lemmy instances 👀
.ml, hexbear and grad up left
Rest down left
Gonna be the most boring one :D
Lemmy.world, sh.itjust.works and Feddit.org are the most centrist ones probably. They’re like liberal leftism while the rest of lemmy tends to be explicitly anti-capitalist.
blahaj up left
I have the feeling that db0 is down right
Absolutely not. libright would be something like communick
I don’t know this one, worth checking out?
Blahaj is explicitly anti-tankie. I mean look at the banner of !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone, so they are clearly lib left.
Whilst dbzer0 is literally explicitly anti-capitalist.
So both of those go lib left. Perhaps dbzer0 more lib and blahaj more left.
blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn’t mean they’re not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.
!196@lemmy.world doesn’t exist for no reason
Youre mixing up moderation style and political ideology.
Blahaj is moderated to be a safe space for trans people. That means they remove anything remotely insulting or harmful. That’s their moderation policy. That doesn’t mean their political views are authoritarian.
both are often linked
Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me
Do you not understand the concept of a safe space?
When you’re literally one of the most politically targeted groups and create a community the point might not be to make it a “free speech zone” but the one place on the internet you feel safe.
That doesn’t make them authoritarian politically. They’re just admins following through on a vision. Where people can freely join their instance or not. Not politicians enforcing their views on people who didn’t consent to it.
Blahaj doesn’t pretend to be a neutral instance like lemmy.ml does. It’s explicit.
Correct. We currently have some sentiment against liberal spaces and DEI programs and so on. And some people think it’s the war against straight white men. But having a men’s groups or women’s groups or safe-spaces to talk freely about whatever topics isn’t authoritarian. The opposite of it is equally true. You can’t discuss certain topics without the correct space for it, and not allowing them to discuss how they like is authoritatian as well!
It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.
When you ban people disagreeing with you, you’re not making anyone feel safer, you’re just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard
When you ban people by stating they’re transphobic when they’re not, you’re being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you’re with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.
When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.
But maybe it’s just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation
Politically illiterate comment
for db0 it might be as frankly I don’t know, it was just a feeling that I have, that they’re more open towards liberalism
But for blahaj, up left seems like the correct spot
Woke, pro freedom of gender/identity, progressive; so most of the time left
Authoritarian, huge voice, strict on voicing their opinions and rules on the subject. You either agree or you’re banned. So authoritarian
Hey, we are an anarchist instance, not "anarcho"capitalist. (Look at db0’s blog, he might be an ai shill but he’s not an ancap)
So you’re at the bottom, but where on the horizontal axis is to be guessed
We’re on the left. The only anarchism is social anarchism.
Ehm… no?
I mean… can you really call it anarchism if you have a n implicit hierarchy? I would say that defeats the point.
Income inequalities don’t implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people
Anarchism mainly rejects the state’s hierarchy. It doesn’t make it left or right
Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules