Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3か月前AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square280fedilinkarrow-up1986arrow-down120cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1966arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3か月前message-square280fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23か月前and? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3か月前The 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3か月前you’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
and? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
The 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
you’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
No worries.