I started to notice a intense automation and Artificial Intelligence Investments from companies and that made me wonder, what would happen or what should be done with the people who can’t be trained for a new job and can’t use his current skills to to get a job.

How would he live or what would he do in life? More importantly, what should be done with him to make him useful or at least neutral rather than being a negative on the society?

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s basically that or communism. Nothing else deals halfway serviceably with a large population of people who can’t be employed.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Like govt is obliged to give you a job?

        Communism has never worked, and if we automate away most jobs, the whole idea it’s founded on becomes obsolete.

        Or do you have some kind of “futuristic communism” idea?

        • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You should look up what actual communists think instead of listening to capitalist propaganda on what communists think. In short, communism is a stateless, classless, moneyless society. The best well-known analogy is the Federation from Star Trek: The Next Generation.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Lol go read some Marx instead of inventing some morally okay dream flavour of authorianism lol.

            “Look up what actual communists think

            I don’t even know where to start with that one, I guess the “right” communists “think” like you? And the “wrong” communists doesn’t?

    • quediuspayu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I lean more on the Universal Maximum Income where everything above a threshold is taxed, and instead of a basic income make sure all basic needs are covered without the need of any money.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I lean more on the Universal Maximum Income where everything above a threshold is taxed

        You literally just described the progressive tax system that every developed country has today

        • quediuspayu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Yes and no, that progressive tax system needs a hard limit that says that you can’t earn more than that. I would want the people to know that they won’t be able to earn more than that hard limit and if they chose to keep working and generate more “riches” beyond that they’re doing it exclusively for the benefit of others.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You raise far more tax revenue able to redistribute as freedom dividends by incentivizing those who can earn $1m/hour to put in more hours.

            • quediuspayu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You’re missing the point, the objective of that is not to collect more tax, objective is to desincentivise greed by making it kinda pointless beyond certain level.

              Also once most of the basic stuff is free I wonder how many people will settle for less pay and less hours. So more jobs would be available.