• Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Contract yes, as it pertains to laws, but I would argue construct no- since protecting one’s offspring is a natural/biological impulse. It’s non negotiable from a survival viewpoint, and some people have better survival instincts than others.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We as creatures behave certain ways because of a result of biology and circumstances. How can you say anything we do isn’t a natural/biological impulse. When did we stop being a part of nature? And stop being controlled by biology?

    • Potatar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You cannot invoke biology to generalize here. There are many mammals who use their offsprings as projectile decoys when they are in danger.

      • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Typically those are mammals with larger litters and shorter gestational periods. Human offspring are too resource intensive to be widely used as decoys.

        This is a weird conversation.

        • Potatar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          As long as one person in history has done it once, yes. Just because people around us doesn’ do it, doesn’t mean it’s not “natural”. I don’t know how tribes with 11 disposable children behave.

          We used to be night active but if you ask anyone nowadays they’d act like waking up to the sun is THE “natural” thing.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Are you suggesting that if even one human lacks this biological impulse to protect their children, we can’t say that humans generally have a biological impulse to protect their children? That’s absurd. And isn’t this point entirely moot with regards to people who do have that in-built instinct?