you want to consider history, but limit that consideration to the last 100 years. bud, those are weak #s. Historically speaking, it’s ignoring the entirety of human civilization except that last few fractions of a percent.
Why am I even bothering to respond to you, it’s obvious your devotion to dogma has completely eclipsed your ability to think.
Oh wait, you probably believe all of human history is like 2000 years and science is a lying bastardman rofls
You clearly have reading comprehension issues, so if you want to be mad be mad at yourself.
But how about you answer my question instead of ignoring it and pretending to be right?
you want to consider history, but limit that consideration to the last 100 years. bud, those are weak #s. Historically speaking, it’s ignoring the entirety of human civilization except that last few fractions of a percent.
Why am I even bothering to respond to you, it’s obvious your devotion to dogma has completely eclipsed your ability to think.
Oh wait, you probably believe all of human history is like 2000 years and science is a lying bastardman rofls
Thank you for dodging my question again and showing everyone how disingenuous you are