That’s only if one actually touches grass
That’s only if one actually touches grass
Government when the elites use loopholes and do devious shit:
I sleep
Government when the peasants use loopholes:
Straight to jail
Different kinds of alcohol is just different flavours of hand sanitiser.
Still could be a dog chew toy without the ‘chew’ part
Not his fault for liking big buns
Their excuse, ‘for the safety of children’.
So he hates the noise the youth made, but is ok with people revving to the extremes.
I d wouldn’t call it new, they’re used quite interchangeably. Also, its usually tied to political stances (conservative->lib & lib->conservative) - its like a insult on political views.
I guess it really makes a difference how you’re having an argument. Generally irl, arguments would be more logical as it is easy to determine if there is sarcasm involved, etc.
Online it may be hard to determine the writers intent, and some may just dismiss the writers comment. This aspect might be the reason why arguments online are so ferocious.
To answer this, no they are not perfectly rational. However they are not dumb, anyone can be a rapist, it is a mental disorder which doesn’t correlate with their IQ.
The ‘tons of reasons’ statement would be interesting to read about, as usually a perpetrators focus is rape and escape. Not befriending the victim - i might suggest how inconsistent this sounds.
Unless the victim has other mental problems then this could occur. However, I was simply seeking an answer, not an explosive statement.
The question was why he didn’t do it sooner. Not when confronted.
If he knew he did something wrong, illegal, and immoral then why did he stay and wait until the victim wakes up.
Thanks for replying. I do see that there is some incompatibility with both our proof. However, I do realise that you’re talking about perpetrators which are close to the victim - and that may yield a different response to that of a random person/ newly met person.
Suffice to say, it does make sense that persons closest to the victim would be the perpetrator.
*receives old Zimbabwean dollars
[Article answers second paragraph]
Thought that an exclaimer will work for some ignorant people but that’s how stuff works.
And I am also interested of why are you so deliberated of calling this ‘stupid shit’, and ‘awful take’? I know I have put it in words wrong and next time I’ll do it better, but I assure you fail to read and understand my comment first.
I’ll refrain from deleting this as I know there are people who understand what I wrote.
Agreed, I miss those type of games.
Oh sorry forgot the question mark there. My bad.
Hi, to answer your question I’d like to ask what convoluted reason did I state?
It’s nice to see you replied to my comment, and the last part of my comment was just a question which I am confused about.
And sorry for coming across as not believing. You could consider that serious accusations shouldn’t be based on beliefs - but facts.
9yo me downloading free games