• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 天前

    Because there is choice. There is very little choice on Windows or Mac, so there’s not really anything to argue about 😅 Champagne problems, if ya ask me.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    4 天前

    It really doesn’t. I highly doubt there isn’t office politics going on inside Microsoft, Apple and Google, but unlike them, Linux development is all public. If anything, that’s likely to curtail a lot of bad behavior rather than encourage it.

  • mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 天前

    It’s sane to have drama. It means we have humans doing the job and power dynamics being discussed. If there’s no drama, it means some people got shut down.

  • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 天前

    It doesn’t really, not compared to what goes on in the office. What little there is, is in public and often exaggerated by commentators.

  • squid64@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 天前

    There is drama in everything. I don’t think GNU/Linux is any different. I don’t really care about what distro other people use tbh, I can joke about it but never seriously argue for which distro, text editor, programming language, etc. is the best. I just like that I can choose and get just what I want.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 天前

    Thats the Point of having an Open Source OS where everyone can have a voice. So you can talk about something if its a pile of dogshit.

    Is the next video going to be „Why is there so much drama in the bundestag“?

  • False@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 天前

    Because there are a lot of people with different goals that conflict with each other? Which is true in lots and lots of other things.