• smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Passwords? A relic, and an insecure one at that.

    instead of scanning your face (which can be spoofed) or fingerprints (which can be copied), these systems scan the ‘pattern’ of the veins running inside your palm – something that’s unique to you, and absolutely can’t be faked.

    Consider me sceptical.

    • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      A few years ago I saw a talk how some hackers where able to fool arm vein scanners. I think it was a talk on the chaos communication congress

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Was it done in such way it could just as easy to fool multiple scanners at the same time? As in scanning eye, finger and palm at the same time. Though I wonder how expensive/difficult/error prone it would be to implement something like that.

        • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, it was only focused on that one biometric. You can always just add another for security, though it is good to keep in mind, that bionetrics aren’t necessarily as secure as they are often marketed as. Fun fact: In the science fiction book “Qualityland” by Marc-Uwe Kling one biometric after another was shown to be insecure, leading to the people having do kiss their tablets/phones for authorizing money transfers, using OneKiss™, which is so more secure than other ways of authentication (trust me bro).

  • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do people assume that a new biometric is more secure than the ones already in use? In all cases, an authority figure only has to knock you out and they have all the access they need.

    Even Spaceballs shows just how easy this is to defeat.

  • MacStache@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Great until you lose your arm in an arms race or something. Locked out of your own home, armless. Lost the race, arm and home.

  • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Palm biometrics is less worse because you have the option not to give in to biometrics, unlike facial biometrics that there is no option not to give in